Let me get this straight
Oh, and a stern finger in the face:
"Every one of them was warned of that in their earnest money contract, in the deed they received, in the title policy they bought," he said. "And whether you like it or not, neither the Constitution of the United States nor the state of Texas nor any law permits you to have a structure on state-owned property that's subject to the flow of the tide."
No doubt this ruling also affects those storm-damaged oil rigs out in the Gulf? Aren't they also subject to the flow of the tide? Different set of rules? Oh, I see... they aren't on the beach. Yet.
Imagine for a moment that this same beach front land wasn't owned by an ordinary citizen, but was instead owned by... AIG, or by Fanny Mae, or by Freddy Mac, or by the Lehman Brothers. The government would - of course - rebuild their offices if they could be rebuilt; and if not, would pay them whatever the property was worth before the storm.
One disaster is not like any other... it's all about who is affected by it.
Because of course - this really isn't about 'public beaches' at all. Texas probably intends to replace these homes with luxurious resort hotels. I'm sure investors are lining up, as they were after Katrina... and after the 2004 Tsumani. It may take a few years, but let's watch what actually happens to that land Texas plans to claim.
And the best part of all, is that whatever the State of Texas decides to do... they can use those former-beachfront-dwellers' tax money to pay for it.
Labels: Gulf Coast, hurricane, Hurricane Ike, Open Beaches Act, Texas
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home