Let every American, every lover of liberty, every well wisher to his posterity, swear by the blood of the Revolution, never to violate in the least particular, the laws of the country; and never to tolerate their violation by others.

As the patriots of seventy-six did to the support of the Declaration of Independence, so to the support of the Constitution and Laws, let every American pledge his life, his property, and his sacred honor; let every man remember that to violate the law, is to trample on the blood of his father, and to tear the charter of his own, and his children's liberty.

Let reverence for the laws, be breathed by every American mother, to the lisping babe, that prattles on her lap; let it be taught in schools, in seminaries, and in colleges; let it be written in Primers, spelling books, and in Almanacs; let it be preached from the pulpit, proclaimed in legislative halls, and enforced in courts of justice. And, in short, let it become the political religion of the nation; and Let the old and the young, the rich and the poor, the grave and the gay, of all sexes and tongues, and colors and conditions, sacrifice unceasingly upon its altars.

While ever a state of feeling, such as this, shall universally, or even, very generally prevail throughout the nation, vain will be every effort, and fruitless every attempt, to subvert our national freedom.


- Abraham Lincoln, January 27, 1838
  Address Before the Young Men's Lyceum of Springfield, Illinois

Saturday, February 07, 2009

Democrats: Offense!!

Perhaps they were bullied as children. Perhaps they are afraid of the loud crashes and clangs that are predictably coming out of the corporate media (run now almost entirely by a handful of powerful elite.) Perhaps they still don't comprehend what happened last November; that we handed them a REAL mandate.

A mandate for change.

It is past time that Congressional Democrats grew a little spine and delivered on promises made.

They cowered for two years since we gave them a majority in the House in 2007, and now they still don't seem to comprehend... that our latest electoral shout indicates that we are no longer asking, but are demanding a change from the last eight years.

Stop listening to the GOP! Damn it -- stop cowering!

But don't listen to me... who am I, anyway? Some miscellaneous American citizen. A blogger, no less. (Eww.)

You certainly ignore me when I call your offices, trying to make my opinion heard.

No, don't listen to me -- listen to Krugman. Perhaps his Nobel prize will get your attention.

On the Edge
By PAUL KRUGMAN

A not-so-funny thing happened on the way to economic recovery. Over the last two weeks, what should have been a deadly serious debate about how to save an economy in desperate straits turned, instead, into hackneyed political theater, with Republicans spouting all the old clichés about wasteful government spending and the wonders of tax cuts.

It’s as if the dismal economic failure of the last eight years never happened — yet Democrats have, incredibly, been on the defensive. Even if a major stimulus bill does pass the Senate, there’s a real risk that important parts of the original plan, especially aid to state and local governments, will have been emasculated.

Somehow, Washington has lost any sense of what’s at stake — of the reality that we may well be falling into an economic abyss, and that if we do, it will be very hard to get out again.

It’s hard to exaggerate how much economic trouble we’re in. The crisis began with housing, but the implosion of the Bush-era housing bubble has set economic dominoes falling not just in the United States, but around the world.

Consumers, their wealth decimated and their optimism shattered by collapsing home prices and a sliding stock market, have cut back their spending and sharply increased their saving — a good thing in the long run, but a huge blow to the economy right now. Developers of commercial real estate, watching rents fall and financing costs soar, are slashing their investment plans. Businesses are canceling plans to expand capacity, since they aren’t selling enough to use the capacity they have. And exports, which were one of the U.S. economy’s few areas of strength over the past couple of years, are now plunging as the financial crisis hits our trading partners.

Meanwhile, our main line of defense against recessions — the Federal Reserve’s usual ability to support the economy by cutting interest rates — has already been overrun. The Fed has cut the rates it controls basically to zero, yet the economy is still in free fall.



Would the Obama economic plan, if enacted, ensure that America won’t have its own lost decade? Not necessarily: a number of economists, myself included, think the plan falls short and should be substantially bigger. But the Obama plan would certainly improve our odds. And that’s why the efforts of Republicans to make the plan smaller and less effective — to turn it into little more than another round of Bush-style tax cuts — are so destructive.

Read more...

Labels: , , , ,

Monday, October 06, 2008

Privitizing healthcare (only the healthy need apply)

Paul Krugman offers a terrifying scenario in today's column, "Health Care Destruction:" the privatization of of health care that puts coverage completely out of the reach... of those who are sick.

Seriously. This would be the McCain 'health care plan.' Its no wonder he rarely talks about it in public.

If you have any pre-existing health problems (this would include McCain and his melanoma -- but he's a multimillionaire, so what does he care?) insurance companies won't have to cover you. If you currently have health care benefits available to you through your job -- and McCain is elected president -- get ready to lose them. He plans to remove health care tax breaks and incentives for employers who provide it.

So you doubt that McCain would do this? You doubt that a Republican would flinch from privatizing health care across the board? Been watching the privatization of schools in New Orleans? Works out fabulously for wealthy, private industry. But it seems that there is a slight glitch in the deal: educating the kids (those who are actually allowed in.)

Anyone that doubts that the GOP would hesitate to privatize anything and put it in the hands of their business buddies hasn't watched the gutting of New Orleans post-Katrina. Disaster capitalism at its best -- coming to a nation near you. Oops -- coming to your nation. Sorry.

Take a hard look around at the wreckage the GOP has left in its 8-year wake and tell me again how sure you are that McCain won't come for what little insurance coverage that you now have.

By the way, I know what it is like to be 'out on my own' without collective coverage through a large employer. Large employers have your back when insurance companies try their usual tricks to avoid paying a claim. If you are on your own... you have a choice between paying all of your medical bills yourself to avoid the hit on your credit when the bills go unpaid, or fighting un-winnable battles with insurance companies who lie to your face and seemingly hold all the cards.

When I owned and operated my own business, I was at the mercy of an insurance company that felt no compulsion to actually pay my bills - even after promising compensation and sending me to strange doctors and a remote hospital for a necessary health screening. I followed their instructions and filled out all of the required paperwork... and they never paid a cent. Every time I called, representatives swore that the bill would be paid.

Meanwhile the medical bill went into collections. The insurance company assumed - and assumed correctly - that I would find some way to pay the bill myself when faced with the loss of my own credit rating (credit I desperately needed for my business.)

Insurance companies are lying, cheating bastards... SiCKO didn't do them justice. Your only protection is your employer and the clout they bring to the table with their large contract. When you go it alone, you lose. Period.

And this is what McCain wants for America... for the lower 95% who can't simply pay medical costs out of pocket.

Krugman, NY Times:

Most Americans under 65 currently get health insurance through their employers. That’s largely because the tax code favors such insurance: your employer’s contribution to insurance premiums isn’t considered taxable income, as long as the employer’s health plan follows certain rules. In particular, the same plan has to be available to all employees, regardless of the size of their paycheck or the state of their health.

This system does a fairly effective job of protecting those it reaches, but it leaves many Americans out in the cold. Workers whose employers don’t offer coverage are forced to seek individual health insurance, often in vain. For one thing, insurance companies offering “nongroup” coverage generally refuse to cover anyone with a pre-existing medical condition. And individual insurance is very expensive, because insurers spend large sums weeding out “high-risk” applicants — that is, anyone who seems likely to actually need the insurance.

So what should be done? Barack Obama offers incremental reform: regulation of insurers to prevent discrimination against the less healthy, subsidies to help lower-income families buy insurance, and public insurance plans that compete with the private sector. His plan falls short of universal coverage, but it would sharply reduce the number of uninsured.

Mr. McCain, on the other hand, wants to blow up the current system, by eliminating the tax break for employer-provided insurance. And he doesn’t offer a workable alternative.

Without the tax break, many employers would drop their current health plans. Several recent nonpartisan studies estimate that under the McCain plan around 20 million Americans currently covered by their employers would lose their health insurance.

As compensation, the McCain plan would give people a tax credit — $2,500 for an individual, $5,000 for a family — that could be used to buy health insurance in the individual market. At the same time, Mr. McCain would deregulate insurance, leaving insurance companies free to deny coverage to those with health problems — and his proposal for a “high-risk pool” for hard cases would provide little help.

So what would happen?

The good news, such as it is, is that more people would buy individual insurance. Indeed, the total number of uninsured Americans might decline marginally under the McCain plan — although many more Americans would be without insurance than under the Obama plan.

But the people gaining insurance would be those who need it least: relatively healthy Americans with high incomes. Why? Because insurance companies want to cover only healthy people, and even among the healthy only those able to pay a lot in addition to their tax credit would be able to afford coverage (remember, it’s a $5,000 credit, but the average family policy actually costs more than $12,000).

Meanwhile, the people losing insurance would be those who need it most: lower-income workers who wouldn’t be able to afford individual insurance even with the tax credit, and Americans with health problems whom insurance companies won’t cover.

Read the rest...


Here is an excellent presentation out of New Hampshire:

Labels: , , , ,